An Israeli influenced NATO carries the blame for the refugee crisis

0
155

We are now seeing the result of a “brain-dead” aggression policy in the Middle East conducted by the USA and NATO according to Israel’s wishes of crushing the Arab states. EU is also carrying a major responsibility in this unholy alliance that has caused enormous human suffering in form of destruction and a refugee catastrophe. That, Jan Westh is writing in his chronicle.

 

An enormous terror attack on the 11th of September 2001 in the USA was the planned starting signal for the destruction of the Middle East. Few people nowadays doubt that the attack was a commissioned work, since all the trails lead to CIA.

That organization or the organizations that planned and executed the attack that killed thousands of people is to be found in the USA: To immediately lead the tracks away from the own power elite, the analyst Bill Bennett already the day after, on the 12th of September, in CNN concluded: “The Congress must declare war against the militant Islam and overwhelming force must be used.”Immediately the one guilty was pointed out without any proofs and that strikes of course back on the own credibility.

The attack became the starting signal for what came to be called the war on terrorism. But even though everything pointed on that the core of the terror was to be found in the USA, immediately a large number of Arab states were pointed out as guilty. It was obviously that one wanted to arrive at that point – to find a reason for demolishing a number of Arab states that happened to be situated to close to Israel. In due time one started to work the plan that came to mean that a large number of terrorists were created where there were none and the destruction of country after country meant of course also that major refugee streams were generated. NATO countries with the USA in the lead carried out both the initial infiltration- and influencing-work but also the direct work of destruction by financing proxy troops like the ISIS.

In an extended Middle East Drama four major actors can be identified, the USA, NATO, Russia and Israel. Only one of these protagonists had as goal to through terror bring about a wrecked Middle East, while two of the other players –the USA and NATO – on the paper wanted to excite more democratic and humanistic states by bombing them to pieces. Russia on the other hand had during many years created better living conditions in e.g. Syria through aid work and wanted to continue along that path as soon as possible. Russia has always opposed Western imperialistic influence, especially in the instable Middle East.

The professors Walt and Mearsheimer have among others carefully documented that what is obvious for the most – namely that the Jewish lobby has a powerful influence in the USA, especially in the area of foreign policy. The result in this case is that Washington is remotely controlled from Jerusalem. NATO’s operational functions are in Brussels but the center for defining its goals and controlling its policies is somewhere in Washington, the town in which Israel with free hands exercise its military-political influence.

Israel is the state that never had to be quite about its intentions. This because it knows that it is USA’s nursling, in the same time as it exploits and profits from USA’s lack of self-reliance and self-confidence. Already in 1982, Israel made clear in a manifest, the so called Yinon Plan, that all Arab states should be scrunched and then it would be suitable to start with Iraq. The demolition of states leads however to enormous refugee streams, something that the Israelian side definitely not complained about, on the contrary. It facilitated namely the goal of a Greater Israel.

The path that Israel entered in1982 was cemented in 1996 in the document New Strategy for Securing the Realm that was produced by a working group under the former and current Israelian prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The implication of this document was a further step on the path of destruction by removing Saddam Hussein from power as the prelude to demolishing a number of states. One also stated that the “way to Damascus goes over Bagdad”. The capital of Syria, Damascus, was not thought to be able to escape and the of Israel and NATO states trained and equipped terrorists were the ones to do the dirty work – to be later executed.

First in the autumn of 2015, after that Wladimir Putin on a G-20 conference revealed that it was these G20-states that whole hearted had supported ISIS, that the Russian President got active and started to with force fight the by the Western Powers cherished terrorists. This in a phase when ISIS was about to take over the whole of Syria.

We are now seeing the result of a “brain-dead” aggression policy carried out by the USA and NATO in line with Israel’s wishes, a state that without transliteration has declared its goal of crushing the Arab states. The result has been an enormous material destruction and a refugee catastrophe with hundreds of thousand families affected. This is something that burdens the whole of Europe. We should here carefully note that it wasn’t the Arabs, with roots in their countries going back thousands of years, that took action to bring about this deadly scenario.

Even if EU would now close its borders, it cannot escape its moral responsibility that EU’s de facto military arm NATO has caused. The “defense organization” NATO will for all future be chained to the pillory for its headless actions, especially the ones during the last 20 years.

Jan Westh

 

Like what we do here at European Free Press? Consider donating!

Please read before commenting!

We welcome thoughtful responses and inputs. Comments including personally identifiable information, harassment, threats, or other violations will be removed.

Commentators are to be held responsible for the content posted in the comment section.